Welcome to Essay Writing Service OrderEssay.net

Choose from a great number of disciplines, deadlines, and corresponding academic levels. Our experienced writers will provide you with original papers written in accordance with your specific requirements.

All you need to do is to submit your paper instructions, proceed with the payment, and wait for your assignment to be delivered right on time.

September 20, 2017

It is impolite to criticize other people



The elusive ethics of criticism always urges us to think twice before making an unpleasant remark. We usually consider self-reflection to be a virtue, but criticizing others seems improper and can damage our interpersonal interaction. But honestly, people like gossiping so much! What can be better than realizing that one has eventually done something right at contrast to their friend who has just failed?  After all, criticism has always been a part of a human nature. It indicates that we try to control ourselves and the others at the same time.

Indeed, it is rather unethical to criticize people for their wrongs. Seeing them fail, we suppose that the right option was evident. “If I were you, I would never consider the path you took”. The only problem is, we do not step into the shoes of those people we criticize. From the observer’s perspective, things always look simpler and clearer than they are in the real life. We cannot see the pitfalls that prevent the others from making a brilliant decision. On their place, we could have failed as well, consequently, our criticism is totally subjective.

We regularly judge people and face criticism ourselves. Sometimes we would like the others to estimate our achievements or express appreciation,  but as we fail, we suddenly want people to act as if nothing has happened. Normally, we know most of our drawbacks but still want to be liked. Besides, all of us react differently to criticism and speculating about the lifestyles of others we can make the subject of gossips really depressed. For this reason, pointing people at their faults is not always the best option.

Learning from experience is better than learning from a book


All of us learn at their own pace and from different sources. The best learning option usually depends on our temperament and interests, therefore, people are not supposed to succeed at the same moment. It is also difficult to evaluate one source of knowledge over the other. The best option is to combine books, online materials, courses, workshops, and professional training if all of them are available.
Books are the oldest tools of preserving knowledge and passing it onto the future generations. For a long time, books were the exclusive and sacred storage of information. With the invention of the printing press, books became accessible to an average reader, which sufficiently stimulated education. Yet some decades ago, books still were the only solid and reliable source of scientific data relevant for all students. But the advent of the Internet showed us that books are not perfect. We cannot update or clarify what is already printed like we always do it with the online resources. Burt still, e-books or paper-printed ones come in handy when we need to get ready for a test or examination. Theoretical material is perfectly laid out in the books.
Bored with the excess of theory, high school students dream of some practical experience in their favorite field. Practicing in the workplace is also a precious experience, in the first place, because it helps to understand the theory. Complicated notions are much more comprehensible if we can observe them in action or touch a tangible model of it. And of course, practice is essential to start work in any field.
As we can see, there is no way to put books over workshops or vice versa. Effective learning happens when we combine all available resources.

It’s better to work for someone than to work for yourself



Running one’s own business usually looks like a superb prospect. First, we imagine the complete freedom from employers and daily commuting that eats up an immense part of our time. We can make our own money and do not depend on the salary of our employers. Which is more, the sky is the limit to our earnings as we can get as much as we are talented and effective. No prejudice and extra workload will expect us after hours anymore. But is home-based business really so bright?

People who work for themselves would certainly tell us that they enjoy the business immensely. But to be honest, it contains some pitfalls that may spoil the idyllic picture we have drawn. Working in a home-based enterprise, we can pay as much attention to our little kids as we want, but they can be a great distraction for a busy person. Also, think about numerous daily choirs that we usually ignore due to the lack of time. All of them will immediately tempt us to distract if we work at home. Clearly, a home-based enterprise is a work for self-disciplined people who can manage their own time and time of everyone at home.

The absence of a dress-code and fixed working hours is a pleasure to many, but things are not so bright when it comes to finances. When we work for ourselves, the cash flow can be unstable. It depends on many factors, and in the first place – on our input. So if something went wrong, it can cost us a weekly salary or even worse. We also cover all business expenses ourselves and pay for medical insurance and vacations from our own pocket.

In general, we face several serious risks while running our own business. Some enterprises flourish and cover the risks easily. Their owners are happy people who set an example for others. But not every small business is a success, and starting one just to get rid of employers is rather a foolish idea.

The cheapest product is always the most economical product



If cheap products were always the best buy, no expensive products would exist in the market. It seems that the price is not always an indicator of a fancy brand or a current vogue. Products easily get expensive because of the quality and origin of materials, taxes, shipping, retail, and many more conditions. Similarly, not all expensive items are necessarily of a high quality. Making informed consumer choices is not easy these days, and the price tag can be very deceitful. But anyway, low prices usually raise our suspicion that we cannot ignore.

No doubt, sometimes we have to invest in items that are supposed to function for a long time. Think about car maintenance. The vehicle is a property that we use for a few years at least, and even after we decide to sell it, the car should better be in the excellent state. Saving money on car maintenance, we can get cheap services, but fluids and appliances of the low quality will make a garbage out of a new car. Therefore, expensive things with a long operating life shall never be spared on unless we want to buy a new item in a short while.

But surely, everything we purchase cannot be of the highest quality. It allows us to spare money on products that must be frequently replaced. Many of us prefer to buy cheap goods at all times but we shall not be tempted by the price. Whether it is high or low, we need to thoroughly consider the purchase before it is done.

Scientific and technological advances are always good



Technological progress has definitely reshaped our lifestyles. Especially active in the last half of the century, digital advancement created new workplaces in particular and boosted the quality of living in general. In future, technology is supposed to have its own intelligence that would allow maximum output without any human involvement in the work of numerous devices. But we have not yet identified, whether such a rush change is for the better or for worse.

To name just a few benefits of technology, it makes our life more comfortable and safe. Medical advancement saves human lives and allows us to control our body. Today we have the newest techniques for diagnosing and treating diseases that were lethal some decades ago. Physicians greatly rely on the newest equipment to estimate the state of the patient precisely.

With the advent of the Internet, all of us admired an unrestricted access to human knowledge. We can work and learn practically everywhere thanks to devices and websites.

Another role of technology is preserving cultural heritage that would otherwise be lost. 3D models stored in cloud assure that no grand human creation will ever be forgotten.

At the same time, technology is not all roses. Moving our activities to the virtual space, technology granted us a sedentary life with little benefits such as nutritious food or physical fitness. Now we realize that a human being cannot go fully digital in order to stay in good health.

Technology has proven to change our mind. The introduction of video games caused addiction all over the world that impaired productivity of people.

With so many pros and cons, the real outcome of technology depends on how we use it. No one but ourselves can decide whether it harms or benefits at the moment.

Is it acceptable for parents to use physical force to discipline their children?



Spanking is a common way for parents to express that children behave badly. Some families do not apply physical force to their kids at all while the others constantly feel the need to remind children of who is the boss. For them, spanking seems to be quick and effective. Some parents apply physical force on impulse: if the child made them angry, they will immediately face the consequences of misbehavior. But scientists remind us that spanking was never a good way to teach children to behave themselves. At the very least, beating may drag low self-esteem though it frequently results in more serious consequences as violence or compulsive behavior.

To start with, corporal punishment certainly makes kids aggressive. Children who are frequently spanked have no other way to express their indignation but to bully the others and involve in fights. If spanking is practiced over the long period of time, it changes the child’s outlooks and they start considering corporal punishment to be a norm. In the adult life, these people usually beat their own children and partners making everyone a victim of abuse.

Girls are especially vulnerable to corporate punishment. Over the time, they develop an inferiority complex. As young women consider family fights to be normal, they tend to ignore the violence of their future partners and cannot adequately react to the real threat.

Lack of emotional attachment inevitably happens in families that prefer corporal punishment over any other type of education. Entire families can be destroyed if parents do not care about nurturing their relationships with children.

How to decrease American poverty rates



Though poverty has hardly declined over the last few years, Congress addressed the problem in a range of governmental reforms a long time ago. Food stamps, the welfare reform law of 1996, subsidies for children in single-parent families curbed poverty that revolved in the 1950s. Today, the nation annually spends nearly a trillion dollars to help the poor, but we have achieved little progress in improving economic mobility. Apparently, the poor need education, employment, affordable housing options to transcend their social class.

Combating poverty is directly connected to preserving nuclear families. Children in single-parent families (especially in female-headed ones) are most likely to grow up in poverty. That is why we need to popularize family planning among the low-income population in the first place.

Education is the next compulsory condition to avoid poverty. For the past decades, the rates of poverty reduced as people started to earn more. Parents shall encourage their children to study and make their own career rather than help adults to earn money from the early age. Families beyond the poverty level shall have their benefits tied to the workplace. Those without any job at all are never encouraged to find it. No social welfare shall be granted to those who are not working in any occupation (except the disabled).

Welfare is not the permanent maintenance aimed to support the poor. Every time, it is designed as a temporary measure aimed to enhance the economic mobility of people that would allow them to live without any governmental subsidies. Reforming our welfare system, we shall think more about stimulating mobility to upper social classes rather than keeping people dependent on donations.

new order
it works?
Call-toll free:

1 866 607-34-46

Phone working hours:
Mon 00:00 — Sat 13:00 (GMT)
Writing Features:
  • Prices starting at just $10/page
  • Overnight delivery option
  • Free revisions according to our Revision Policy
  • A team of experienced writers
  • Money back guarantee
Current Activity:
  • 296 writers active;
  • 8.5/10 current average quality score;